Design Review Board
Oakwood/Lincoln Park Infill Housing Overlay District
4-D-20-IH
Location
435 Oglewood Ave. 37917
Owner
Mario Mario Martini
Applicant Request
Changes to porches visible from the primary streetStaff recommends approval of the project due the following reasons:
1. The Infill Guidelines state that addition of a porch to a Ranch-style house may be acceptable in some 1930-1950 era neighborhoods. While the Oakwood neighborhood is not from this era, the houses on this block are. The house can be characterized as a Transitional Ranch House.
2. Guidelines recommend an 8-ft porch, but since the proposal is to add a porch over an existing patio slab, staff finds the 6-ft depth acceptable. It is unclear when the patio was added. Historical aerials from the early 1980s show the patio; aerials from earlier decades are too blurry to read.
3. The front setback of the primary structure will not change, as the front exterior wall will remain as is. The front setback of the porch will be approximately 20 ft. This is similar to that of other front porches on the street. (Front setbacks of the primary structures with porches average approximately 20 ft. Front setbacks of porches average approximately 17 ft.)
4. The open, decorative trusses proposed are not consistent with architectural characteristics of a transitional Ranch-style house.
5. Vertical siding is not permitted per the Infill Housing Guidelines.
1. The Infill Guidelines state that addition of a porch to a Ranch-style house may be acceptable in some 1930-1950 era neighborhoods. While the Oakwood neighborhood is not from this era, the houses on this block are. The house can be characterized as a Transitional Ranch House.
2. Guidelines recommend an 8-ft porch, but since the proposal is to add a porch over an existing patio slab, staff finds the 6-ft depth acceptable. It is unclear when the patio was added. Historical aerials from the early 1980s show the patio; aerials from earlier decades are too blurry to read.
3. The front setback of the primary structure will not change, as the front exterior wall will remain as is. The front setback of the porch will be approximately 20 ft. This is similar to that of other front porches on the street. (Front setbacks of the primary structures with porches average approximately 20 ft. Front setbacks of porches average approximately 17 ft.)
4. The open, decorative trusses proposed are not consistent with architectural characteristics of a transitional Ranch-style house.
5. Vertical siding is not permitted per the Infill Housing Guidelines.
Staff Comments
The applicant is proposing the following modifications to the existing house:
1. A front porch is proposed where the front patio currently sits.
2. The roofline will be modified so that the larger gable will move forward to meet the front wall of the house, and the small hipped roof at the front of the house will be removed. A smaller gable with the same pitch (8:12) will cover the front porch and will align with the right side of the larger gable.
3. Roof materials will be the same as those of the existing roof.
4. The front door on the left side of the façade is proposed to be infilled (retaining the front door on the right).
5. The brick will be painted.
6. A planter box at ground level and the same height as the exposed foundation is proposed along the front porch.
1. A front porch is proposed where the front patio currently sits.
2. The roofline will be modified so that the larger gable will move forward to meet the front wall of the house, and the small hipped roof at the front of the house will be removed. A smaller gable with the same pitch (8:12) will cover the front porch and will align with the right side of the larger gable.
3. Roof materials will be the same as those of the existing roof.
4. The front door on the left side of the façade is proposed to be infilled (retaining the front door on the right).
5. The brick will be painted.
6. A planter box at ground level and the same height as the exposed foundation is proposed along the front porch.
Applicant
Planning Staff
Email: michelle.portier@knoxplanning.org
Kimberlie Kimberlie Parks Martini Development, LLC Martini Dev
Planning Staff
Michelle Portier
Phone: 865-215-3821Email: michelle.portier@knoxplanning.org
Case History
- December 11, 2006
- January 24, 2007
- March 14, 2007
- March 28, 2007
- March 30, 2007
- April 25, 2007
- June 28, 2007
- October 29, 2007
- October 31, 2007
- November 5, 2007
- November 13, 2007
- November 26, 2007
- November 28, 2007
- December 11, 2007
- December 17, 2007
- January 23, 2008
- February 19, 2008
- February 29, 2008
- March 13, 2008
- March 26, 2008
- March 27, 2008
- March 28, 2008
- May 28, 2008
- June 16, 2008
- August 8, 2008
- November 27, 2008
- December 12, 2008
- January 21, 2009
- January 27, 2009
- March 25, 2009
- May 27, 2009
- June 16, 2009
- July 22, 2009
- August 17, 2009
- October 15, 2009
- October 28, 2009
- November 25, 2009
- November 30, 2009
- December 23, 2009
- January 28, 2010
- February 24, 2010
- March 24, 2010
- March 26, 2010
- July 28, 2010
- October 27, 2010
- February 23, 2011
- March 23, 2011
- April 1, 2011
- May 4, 2011
- June 9, 2011
- July 27, 2011
- August 30, 2011
- October 26, 2011
- December 8, 2011
- December 21, 2011
- January 25, 2012
- March 20, 2012
- March 28, 2012
- April 16, 2012
- May 23, 2012
- August 17, 2012
- August 22, 2012
- October 24, 2012
- November 28, 2012
- December 3, 2012
- January 23, 2013
- February 1, 2013
- February 27, 2013
- March 27, 2013
- April 24, 2013
- August 28, 2013
- October 23, 2013
- November 27, 2013
- December 9, 2013
- December 18, 2013
- January 22, 2014
- February 3, 2014
- February 26, 2014
- March 24, 2014
- April 23, 2014
- April 30, 2014
- May 29, 2014
- November 19, 2014
- December 17, 2014
- January 30, 2015
- March 3, 2015
- March 4, 2015
- March 25, 2015
- August 19, 2015
- December 16, 2015
- January 27, 2016
- February 24, 2016
- March 23, 2016
- April 27, 2016
- August 24, 2016
- October 26, 2016
- November 16, 2016
- December 21, 2016
- February 22, 2017
- March 22, 2017
- April 6, 2017
- May 4, 2017
- October 5, 2017
- November 2, 2017
- December 7, 2017
- January 4, 2018
- February 1, 2018
- March 1, 2018
- April 5, 2018
- May 3, 2018
- August 2, 2018
- October 4, 2018
- December 6, 2018
- January 3, 2019
- March 7, 2019
- August 1, 2019
- October 3, 2019
- November 7, 2019
- February 6, 2020
- March 5, 2020
- April 2, 2020
- October 21, 2020
- November 18, 2020
- December 16, 2020
- January 20, 2021
- February 17, 2021
- March 17, 2021
- April 21, 2021
- May 19, 2021
- October 20, 2021
- November 17, 2021
- December 15, 2021
- January 19, 2022
- February 16, 2022
- March 16, 2022
- April 20, 2022
- May 18, 2022
- July 20, 2022
- August 17, 2022
- September 26, 2022
- October 19, 2022
- November 16, 2022
- December 21, 2022
- February 15, 2023
- March 15, 2023
- April 14, 2023
- April 19, 2023
- October 18, 2023
- November 15, 2023
- December 1, 2023
- December 20, 2023
- January 4, 2024
- February 21, 2024
- February 26, 2024
- February 28, 2024
- March 20, 2024
- April 15, 2024
- April 17, 2024
- May 23, 2024
- June 20, 2024
- October 2, 2024
- October 16, 2024
- November 20, 2024
- November 21, 2024
- December 16, 2024
- December 18, 2024
- January 3, 2025
- January 15, 2025
- January 27, 2025
- February 19, 2025
- March 19, 2025
To be heard